Subject: Re: Agenda Items for 05-18-2005 Meeting
Newsgroups: gmane.mail.spam.spf.council
Date: 2005-05-17 10:28:35 GMT (4 years, 7 weeks, 10 hours and 50 minutes ago)
In <20050513190949.GA4353 <at> moongroup.com> Chuck Mead <csm <at> moongroup.com> writes: > We need to start building our agenda for next weeks meeting. > > What's on for it guys? Sorry for not getting this list to you sooner. I was kind of hoping to get more feedback on whether the changes in the -01pre6 draft were enough for several of these issues. Since the SPF council is being asked to rule on these technical issues, it is *REALLY* important that all council members read the threads and understand the consequences. I have found the following items about the draft that people would like a ruling from the council on: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected? Scott Kitterman (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 16:54:21 EDT) http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss <at> v2.listbox.com/200504/0293.html This language has been updated and can be found in the second paragraph of section 2.5.7 http://www.schlitt.net/spf/spf_classic/draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre6.html#anchor11 Scott said he could live with the current language: http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss <at> v2.listbox.com/200505/0400.html For SPF council review: MUST accept source routes Frank Ellermann (Fri May 06 2005 - 02:10:28 EDT) http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss <at> v2.listbox.com/200505/0140.html no change in -01pre6 was made for this. For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED Scott Kitterman (Sat May 07 2005 - 13:40:28 EDT) http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss <at> v2.listbox.com/200505/0198.html This language has been updated and can be found in the second paragraph of section 2.4 http://www.schlitt.net/spf/spf_classic/draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre6.html#anchor5 For SPF council review: Definition of PASS, Policy for shared MTAs Scott Kitterman (Sat May 07 2005 - 14:22:12 EDT) http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss <at> v2.listbox.com/200505/0204.html This language has been updated and can be found in the second paragraph of section 10.4 and 9.4 http://www.schlitt.net/spf/spf_classic/draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre6.html#cross-user-forgery It is possible that there will be other requests made before the meeting. I hope we can accomidate them, if that happens. -wayne