Subject: Re: Moving away from reporting to RH bugzilla and adopting pure upstream reporting mantra.
Date: Tuesday 24th September 2013 12:44:43 UTC (over 4 years ago)
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:29:04 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > There is no such rough split between package (co-)maintainers and > > "the QA community". I don't even know how you define "the QA community". > > Those that participate in QA community activity testing/reporting etc. That includes package (co-)maintainers who acquire 'watchbugzilla' access in pkgdb and handle incoming problem reports. It is a perfectly fine scenario for somebody, let's say "a power-user", with interest in a Fedora package to join as a co-maintainer and focus on problem reports and testing of the "product" we release, even if there may be no interest in 'commit' access to the Fedora package. That doesn't "ship [...] package maintainership responsibility over to the QA community", but only shows how open the Fedora Project is for commitment from interested people. -- test mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test