Subject: Re: Moving away from reporting to RH bugzilla and adopting pure upstream reporting mantra.
Date: Tuesday 24th September 2013 11:45:48 UTC (over 3 years ago)
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:29:52 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > On 09/24/2013 11:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > _Why_ are they "in no communication with upstream"? > > ? > > Because there is no requirement for them doing so when they become > maintainers for a given package https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_responsibilities#Work_with_upstream > nor is it being ensured if package is > orphaned that the maintainer that takes it over is in any communication > with upstream. Same as above. > The rest is basically you telling us that you want ship that package > maintainership responsibility over to the QA community ( > triagers/testers ) There is no such rough split between package (co-)maintainers and "the QA community". I don't even know how you define "the QA community". > if that is the case is it not better that our > triager/tester teams deal directly with upstream with the people that > know and can fix their code. Can't comment on that before clearing up the matters above. -- test mailing list email@example.com To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test