Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Dan =?UTF-8?B?SG9yw6Fr?= <dan <at> danny.cz>
Subject: Re: Moving away from reporting to RH bugzilla and adopting pure upstream reporting mantra.
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers
Date: Tuesday 24th September 2013 06:45:34 UTC (over 3 years ago)
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:07:04 -0400
Bill Nottingham  wrote:

> Jan Wildeboer ([email protected]) said: 
> > How will you track blocker bugs?
> > 
> > How can we see a global view of all open bugs? Aggregate from X
> > upstream bug report systems? Which not all are Bugzilla?
> > 
> > How can we track critical bugs?
> 
> Additional concerns I'd have above this:
> 
> - Not all things we ship have active upstream bug trackers to fall
> back on
> - We still need a way to track Fedora-specific integration & packaging
>   concerns, which would likely get closed upstream as 'NOTABUG' for
> that project
> - What filing downstream gives the Fedora maintainer is a good
> mechanism for knowing what's going on in that package in Fedora.
> Tracking *all* upstream bugs in a bug tracker may not be a good way
> to do so.
> 
> Honestly, I think a good dedicated triage team that works to verify
> and move upstream as appropriate works better. But, you know,
> requires getting and keeping such a team.

we are missing a tool that would clone the Fedora bugs from bugzilla to
upstream bug trackers. I think the removal of the manual work needed to
copy all the information from bugzilla to upstream tracker would be
appreciated by the packagers. I have the idea for the tool for quite
some time, but didn't find the time to realize it :-(


		Dan
-- 
test mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
 
CD: 3ms