Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata <at> linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC v5 PATCH 0/8] CFS Hard limits - v5
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Date: Tuesday 5th January 2010 07:57:03 UTC (over 6 years ago)
Hi,

This is the v5 post of CFS hard limits. In this patchset, I have
pulled out bandwidth and runtime handling code from RT into sched.c
so that the same code can be used by CFS hard limits.

Also I have addressed the review comments given by Peter Zijlstra for v4.

Changes
-------
RFC v5:
- Make RT bandwidth and runtime handing code generic and use it in CFS
also.
- Remove the *_locked() version from sched_fair.c by simplifying the
locking.
  This fixes the unlock imbalance bug seen by Jarek Dylag who observed it
while
  using CFS hard limits with Linux vserver.

RFC v4:
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/17/191
- Reclaim runtimes lent to other cpus when a cpu goes
  offline. (Kamalesh Babulal)
- Fixed a few bugs.
- Some cleanups.

RFC v3:
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/9/65
- Till v2, I was updating rq->nr_running when tasks go and come back on
  runqueue during throttling and unthrottling. Don't do this.
- With the above change, quite a bit of code simplification is achieved.
  Runtime related fields of cfs_rq are now being protected by per cfs_rq
  lock instead of per rq lock. With this it looks more similar to rt.
- Remove the control file cpu.cfs_hard_limit which enabled/disabled hard
limits
  for groups. Now hard limits is enabled by having a non-zero runtime.
- Don't explicitly prevent movement of tasks into throttled groups during
  load balancing as throttled entities are anyway prevented from being
  enqueued in enqueue_task_fair().
- Moved to 2.6.32-rc6

RFC v2:
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/30/115
- Upgraded to 2.6.31.
- Added CFS runtime borrowing.
- New locking scheme
    The hard limit specific fields of cfs_rq (cfs_runtime, cfs_time and
    cfs_throttled) were being protected by rq->lock. This simple scheme
will
    not work when runtime rebalancing is introduced where it will be
required
    to look at these fields on other CPU's which requires us to acquire
    rq->lock of other CPUs. This will not be feasible from update_curr().
    Hence introduce a separate lock (rq->runtime_lock) to protect these
    fields of all cfs_rq under it.
- Handle the task wakeup in a throttled group correctly.
- Make CFS_HARD_LIMITS dependent on CGROUP_SCHED (Thanks to Andrea Righi)

RFC v1:
- First version of the patches with minimal features was posted at
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/25/128

RFC v0:
- The CFS hard limits proposal was first posted at
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/4/24

Patches description
-------------------
This post has the following patches:

1/8 sched: Rename struct rt_bandwidth to sched_bandwidth
2/8 sched: Make rt bandwidth timer and runtime related code generic
3/8 sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups
4/8 sched: Enforce hard limits by throttling
5/8 sched: Unthrottle the throttled tasks
6/8 sched: Add throttle time statistics to /proc/sched_debug
7/8 sched: CFS runtime borrowing
8/8 sched: Hard limits documentation

 Documentation/scheduler/sched-cfs-hard-limits.txt   |   48 +
 include/linux/sched.h                               |    6 
 init/Kconfig                                        |   13 
 kernel/sched.c                                      |  591
+++++++++++++++++---
 kernel/sched_debug.c                                |   23 
 kernel/sched_fair.c                                 |  354 +++++++++++
 kernel/sched_rt.c                                   |  268 +--------
 7 files changed, 964 insertions(+), 339 deletions(-)

Regards,
Bharata.
 
CD: 2ms