|
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] fireflier LSM for labeling sockets based on its creator (owner) Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel, gmane.linux.kernel.lsm Date: 2006-04-07 18:24:23 GMT (3 years, 12 weeks, 5 days, 4 hours and 14 minutes ago) Hi, The purpose of the fireflier LSM is to "label" each socket with a context, where the context is a (list of) the program(s) that has/have access to it. I've written fireflier LSM to allow filtering packets "per application". It is meant to be used only when SELinux is not available (not available/disabled at boot). For more details, see the initial discussion [1] Summary of how fireflier LSM works: - each program is associated a sid, depending on its mountpoint+inode, i.e. 2 processes launched from the same program have the same sid - each socket created by a processis labeled with the process's sid - if 2 or more programs have access to the socket, it is labeled with a "group sid". A group sid contains a list of the sids of programs having access - userspace, or iptables module can match packets on this "fireflier context" As I stated in my previous mail, I intend to write a userspace policy module generator, that is to be used when selinux is enabled. When it is disabled, then only would the fireflier lsm be used. I am asking for your comments/suggestions on the following issues: - security/correctness of the LSM (is there a way for a program to have access to a socket, and escaping the labeling?) - how do I generate an SELinux policy, that does what this LSM module does? If (and when) I succeed in writing this userspace policy generator, the fireflier lsm might be dropped, and replaced with the policy generator: even if the user has no selinux policy & tools, he can use fireflier policy generator for labeling only, all he has to do, is boot with selinux=1. However on many distributions in that case a default policy is loaded, so we would have to deactivate that (we can't _require_ the user to actually have selinux set up). Not really a nice solution. However dropping the lsm module can be done only in the fireflier 2.1, or 2.2 it will most probably be included in fireflier 2.0 (currently in beta). @Martin Maurer: what is your opinion on this? Cheers, Edwin [1]http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.0/0133.html |
|
|