|
Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel Date: 2005-03-03 03:37:44 GMT (4 years, 17 weeks, 4 days, 18 hours and 32 minutes ago) On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > If we want a calming period, we need to do development like 2.4.x is > done today. It's sane, understandable and it works. No. It's insane, and the only reason it works is that 2.4.x is a totally different animal. Namely it doesn't have the kind of active development AT ALL any more. It _only_ has the "even" number kind of things, and quite frankly, even those are a lot less than 2.6.x has. > 2.6.x-pre: bugfixes and features > 2.6.x-rc: bugfixes only And the reason it does _not_ work is that all the people we want testing sure as _hell_ won't be testing -rc versions. That's the whole point here, at least to me. I want to have people test things out, but it doesn't matter how many -rc kernels I'd do, it just won't happen. It's not a "real release". In contrast, making it a real release, and making it clear that it's a release in its own right, might actually get people to use it. Might. Maybe. Linus |
|
|