On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:38:37 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov
> > That rather sucks. It leaves an all-zeroes instance of dev_pm_ops
> > uselessly bloating the driver.
> It is per-driver, not per device so do we really care?
We care about everything. If the objective was to make life easier for
ourselves, we'd all be on the golf course.
> > And it leaves
> > bd2802_i2c_driver.driver.pm pointing at that all-zeroes instance of
> > dev_pm_ops, which is rather dangerous.
> Nothing dagerous here - PM core deals with half-filled pm_ops just fine.
> > If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n, the .driver.pm field shouldn't exist at all.
> Meh, we have _waaay_ too many config options, I'd rather see CONFIG_PM
> and possibly CONFIG_PM_SLEEP go, maybe leaving us with
> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and maybe not. How many devices out there do not want
Don't know. How do we determine this?