Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Ismail =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6nmez?= <ismail <at> pardus.org.tr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.lsm
Date: Sunday 3rd February 2008 06:25:48 UTC (over 9 years ago)
At Sunday 03 February 2008 around 08:18:12 Andrew Morton wrote:
> So how do we ever get to the stage where we can recommend that
distributors
> turn these things on, and have them agree with us?

FWIW with my distributor hat on I think File system capabilities are very
nice 
and enables one to ship a distribution with a small set of setuid binaries.

On the other hand for per-process securebits, it would be nice to see a 
complete example how it could be applied to a setuid program. That would be
a 
nice step in moving forward.

Regards,
ismail

-- 
Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
CD: 13ms