Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Andrew Morton <akpm <at> linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.lsm
Date: Sunday 3rd February 2008 06:18:12 UTC (over 9 years ago)
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:01:51 -0800 "Andrew G. Morgan" 
wrote:

> Here is the very very long version (which took some time to write, and I
> thought was a bit much to spam these lists with):
> 
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~morgan/sendmail-capabilities-war-story.html

Thanks.  Imagine not testing the retrn value from something like setuid().
Oh well.  The reasoning for disabling it was good.

So how do we ever get to the stage where we can recommend that distributors
turn these things on, and have them agree with us?

Do we have sufficiently stern things in place to prevent them from turning
it on by accident?  Some of them are pretty gung-ho.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
CD: 3ms