Gmane
From: Wesley Leggette <wleggette <at> gate.net>
Subject: [Fwd: RE: Init replacement]
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Date: 2003-05-06 16:48:37 GMT (5 years, 17 weeks, 5 days, 8 hours and 54 minutes ago)

-- 
Wesley Leggette <wleggette <at> gate.net>
From: Brenden Walker <BKWalker <at> DRBSystems.com>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Init replacement
Date: 2003-05-05 18:53:06 GMT
Speaking of gentoo init stuff, I noticed that several apps (pure-ftpd, swat
and cvspserver) are by default installed for xinet startup (so I ended up
emerging xinet too, rather than bothering).

Any reason these are configured that way?  Just curious.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wesley Leggette [mailto:wleggette <at> gate.net] 
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Init replacement
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 07:33, foser wrote:
> > Wesley Leggette wrote:
> > 
> > > As for the other scripting languages you mention, I don't think 
> > > that's relavant because nobody's suggesting converting to 
> python or 
> > > haskell. As far as I can tell, the suggestion is to use 
> XML. That's 
> > > why I brought it back up.
> > > 
> > 
> > I'd say all of this dicussion is not relevant, the Gentoo 
> init is not
> > questioned here. The guy just tried to promote his new init 
> system and 
> > that shouldn't have been done on this ml, it does not 
> belong here. Don't 
> > tie this in vs. the Gentoo init system, that works fine as 
> it is and 
> > maybe in the future something better pops up. pinit wasn't 
> meant as a 
> > replacement, don't start discussing it here like it was.
> > 
> > - foser
> 
> I agree whole heartedly. It's just an idea some guy came up 
> with. It's not the end of the world.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list
> -- 
> Wesley Leggette <wleggette <at> gate.net>
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list
> 

--
gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list