|
Subject: [Fwd: RE: Init replacement] Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel Date: 2003-05-06 16:48:37 GMT (5 years, 17 weeks, 5 days, 8 hours and 54 minutes ago) -- Wesley Leggette <wleggette <at> gate.net> Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Init replacement Date: 2003-05-05 18:53:06 GMT Speaking of gentoo init stuff, I noticed that several apps (pure-ftpd, swat and cvspserver) are by default installed for xinet startup (so I ended up emerging xinet too, rather than bothering). Any reason these are configured that way? Just curious. > -----Original Message----- > From: Wesley Leggette [mailto:wleggette <at> gate.net] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 2:31 PM > To: gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Init replacement > > > On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 07:33, foser wrote: > > Wesley Leggette wrote: > > > > > As for the other scripting languages you mention, I don't think > > > that's relavant because nobody's suggesting converting to > python or > > > haskell. As far as I can tell, the suggestion is to use > XML. That's > > > why I brought it back up. > > > > > > > I'd say all of this dicussion is not relevant, the Gentoo > init is not > > questioned here. The guy just tried to promote his new init > system and > > that shouldn't have been done on this ml, it does not > belong here. Don't > > tie this in vs. the Gentoo init system, that works fine as > it is and > > maybe in the future something better pops up. pinit wasn't > meant as a > > replacement, don't start discussing it here like it was. > > > > - foser > > I agree whole heartedly. It's just an idea some guy came up > with. It's not the end of the world. > > > > > > > -- > > gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list > -- > Wesley Leggette <wleggette <at> gate.net> > > > -- > gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list |
|
|