|
Subject: Re: Gentoo-sources vs "stock" kernels Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel Date: 2003-01-23 19:41:06 GMT (5 years, 31 weeks, 22 hours and 23 minutes ago) On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:33:28PM +0200, Dewet Diener wrote: > Op Do 23 Jan 03 21:20 skrewe Kim Nielsen: > > I use USB devices with the gentoo-sources kernel and it works fine. > > The differnce between the vanilla and gentoo is alot of patches for > > things like grsecurity, freeswan etc. > > That's my question (albeit stated very badly) -- how > reliable/tested/stable are those patches? The case in point being the > grsecurity issues I've seen. What I really want to know is whether > other people are using those features successfully, specifically > relating to a *server*-class setup (therefore, things like USB, etc > aren't that important). The gentoo kernel is quite stable but Gentoo was never ment as a server distribution even though it serves just as well as others like Redhat or Debian. It was intedned for network/developer use /Kim |
|
|