|
Subject: Re: works-with-format for bioinformatics Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.debtags Date: 2008-11-17 10:52:27 GMT (1 year, 12 weeks, 10 hours and 17 minutes ago) On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:04:12AM -0800, Shaun Jackman wrote: > 2008/11/15 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack <at> debian.org>: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 01:18:32PM -0800, Shaun Jackman wrote: > >> The following two tags are required (but missing currently) for the > >> field of bioinformatics. > > http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faq.html#what-makes-a-tag-good-for-being-added-to-the-vocabulary > > Please provide the data suggested by the FAQ reported above. > I just found the tag biology::format:fasta. How does this differ from > the nonexistant tag works-with-format::fasta? Why is the first > separator two colons (::) and the second separator a single colon (:)? > Seems arbitrary. > biology::format:fastq is also needed. maq, for example, reads FASTQ > format and not FASTA format. It's an important distinction. From the link that Stefano posted: * It should represent a clear, atomic concept (check) * It should have a facet to fit in (check) * There should be more than 6 or 7 packages in Debian that can make use of it Can you please list such packages? Also, since we have biology::format:fasta, why are you suggesting works-with-format::fasta and works-with-format::fastq instead of just biology::format:fastq? Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico <at> debian.org> |
|
|