|
Subject: Proposed Changes to MeSH Subheadings Newsgroups: gmane.education.libraries.medlib Date: 2006-03-23 17:54:41 GMT (3 years, 14 weeks, 6 days, 9 hours and 4 minutes ago) Dear Medlibbers, The Reference Librarians at my library have been reviewing the proposed changes to subheadings. In general, we are dismayed by the proposal and are preparing a response to share with NLM. NLM says they are trying to tweak the system to make it easier for the infrequent and/or untrained searcher. However, in our experience, the infrequent/untrained searcher does not use subheadings anyway. If anything having more, specific subheadings would make more sense to end users (why would anyone think that deficiency is covered by the etiology subheading?!). We also find some parts of the proposal unclear and are curious about how other librarians are interpreting the proposal. Our specific questions: 1. Looking at the Revised MeSH Qualifier Concepts and Hierarchy: It states, "italics = qualifier retained as subordinate concept (entry term)" Does this mean the term will still be available singly? For example, poisoning and toxicity are indented in italics under adverse effects. If I am only interested in aspirin poisoning, will I still be able to search aspirin/po? Does this mean that if I am interested in the adverse effects of aspirin that selecting the adverse effects subheading will automatically select the poisoning and toxicity subheadings, too (an "explode" for subheadings, if you will). 2. What happens to articles indexed under the "old" subheading scheme? What about searches (esp. saved searches)? For example, deficiency is one of the proposed deletions and it will be replaced with etiology. What happens to articles already indexed under zinc/df? Will their records be changed? If I search zinc/df will I get articles indexed prior to the change? Will searches of zinc/et now pull articles indexed as zinc/df? 3. What exactly are the indexers going to be instructed to do? 4. What does this sentence mean? "Since all access points are preserved via entry vocabulary, searchers will be able to continue to use the terminology with which they are familiar." Here are links from Cindy Schmidt at the McGoogan Library of Medicine in Nebraska for your reference. http://www.unmc.edu/library/mcmla/Subheading_announcement.doc and http://www.unmc.edu/library/mcmla/Revised_Qualifer_Lists.doc I am looking forward to the discussion of NLM's proposal. Julie M. Trumble Head of Reference and Educational Services Moody Medical Library The University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Texas 77555-1035 409-772-3642 409-762-5586 (fax) jtrumble@... |
|
|