Subject: Re: Flavour setup
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.user
Date: 2004-08-10 17:36:47 GMT (4 years, 46 weeks, 5 days, 6 hours and 3 minutes ago)
I don't think anyone's disputing whether it's a good thing to have. My issue is the amount of time it'd take to build the flavour-oriented registry code for the site and writing some "well-written" "nice-looking" flavour templates. That's a lot of work. No one seems to use the plugin registry much, so I'm not sure I see much value in building a flavour registry. But, like I said before, any volunteered help is greatly appreciated. If a few people volunteer to work on stuff and thus halve the work I have to do, that helps a lot. Things don't happen without someone to do them and I don't want to throw more time at PyBlosxom without more community involvement. /will On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, mollo wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:05:51 -0500 (CDT) > will guaraldi <willg@...> wrote: > > Hello Will, > > > I'm interested in starting a flavour registry similar to the plugin > > registry I have for PyBlosxom but I don't think there's enough interest > > to put the work into it. So it's been on the back burner. > > Don't know if a such registry will be time consumming for you. > > But I can state having from the existing blosxom flavour something usable > and validator compliant was not as easy. > > So IMHO that's a good idea to have, including a small number of, well > written flavours. > > Ciao' > Mathieu ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285