Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Ram Rachum <ram <at> rachum.com>
Subject: Re: Silly Python riddle
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.israel
Date: Saturday 17th December 2011 13:13:12 UTC (over 6 years ago)
Haha, I didn't consider that solution. And yes, it can be done with less
characters than 13.

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, ofri raviv  wrote:

> my trivial 13 char solution is
> );g=lambda:(0
> which gives
> f = lambda: g(*);g=lambda:(0*)
> but i'm sure this can be done with less...
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Ram Rachum  wrote:
>
>> Of course you can put a function call inside a lambda:
>>
>> >>> f = lambda: sum((1, 2, 3))
>>> >>> f()
>>> 6
>>
>>
>> No easter eggs or JIT magic are involved in this riddle.
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:55 PM, asaf greenberg
wrote:
>>
>>>  On 17/12/2011 14:14, Ram Rachum wrote:
>>>
>>> f = lambda: g(*???*)
>>>
>>> i didn't know lambdas can be used with a function call.
>>>
>>> actaully - i can't even use lambda: f() at all, even without your
>>> restrictions.
>>>
>>> unless there's a jit compiler easter egg built in, like lambda g('if
>>> this string then return a 3d-maze with pictures of the developers')...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Python-il mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-il mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il
>>
>>
>
 
CD: 3ms