Subject: Re: Boost Release Candidate Branch
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.build
Date: 2002-05-11 13:39:35 GMT (7 years, 7 weeks, 6 days, 13 hours and 24 minutes ago)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen <at> si-lab.org> > would'nt it be easier to just provide the jam executable and specify in the > doc that you need to rename or link it to bjam if one wants v2 behaviour. > It's kinda overkill to put two identical execs on the web. The Unix distro just makes a link. At best we should provide only "bjam". > Is there any noticeable difference from the user point of view btw ? Yes, no need to specify -sBOOST_ROOT=... Hmm, maybe we should remove the special hacks which accomodate -sBOOST_ROOT=... to invoke v1 behavior from the command-line, and just distribute "bjam". -Dave