Subject: Re: AOP without the buzzwords
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.lightweight
Date: 2004-06-08 04:37:48 GMT (5 years, 3 weeks, 5 days, 2 hours and 13 minutes ago)
Scott McKay wrote: > As far as I can tell, if you have the following, you > can pretty much do what AOP requires: > - CLOS- or Dylan-style generic function-based multi-methods > - reasonably capable macros, as in Lisp, Scheme, or Dylan > - function "advice", which exists in most Lisp implementations, > but nothing else AFAICT Sure, and if you have a language that can express the concept of "array of procedures" then you have all you need to do object-oriented programming.