Home Reading Searching Subscribe Sponsors Statistics Posting Contact Spam Lists Links About Hosting Filtering Features Download Marketing Archives FAQ Blog From: Florent BALESTRIERI cnsmdp.fr> Subject: TraverseAccum: an effectful accumulating map. Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe Date: Tuesday 28th April 2009 14:50:33 UTC (over 9 years ago) ```Hello fellow haskellers. This message is a valid literate haskell file. I ran it with ghc 6.10.1 > module TraverseAccum where > import Control.Applicative > import Data.Traversable A year ago, I read "Why Attribute Grammars Matter". In it we found a function on lists wich combined three traversals into one to compute the differences to the average: > avg_diff_list :: [Double] -> [Double] > avg_diff_list xs = > let nil = const (0,0.0,[]) > cons x f mean = > let (n,s,ds) = f mean > in (n+1,s+x, (x - mean) : ds) > (n,s,ds) = foldr cons nil xs (s/n) > in ds Then I found "Applicative programming with effects" which abstracted the notions of traversal and folding. We can try and generalize avg_diff_list to work over any Traversable data structure. Here is a possible version with two traversals: > avg_diff' :: (Traversable t, Fractional f) > => t f -> t f > avg_diff' t = > let start = (0,0.0) > step (n,s) x = ((n+1, s+x), \mean -> x - mean) > ((n,s), diffs) = mapAccumL step start t > in sequenceA diffs (s/n) But we can do better with only a single traversal. The idea is to define a function traverseAccumL which does the work of mapAccumL but with an effectful map. (mapM) The definition of mapAccumL uses a StateL applicative functor whereas traverseAccumL uses a StateL monad transformer. First a few definitions. > -- left-to-right state transformer > newtype StateLT m s a = StateLT { runStateLT :: s -> m (s, a) } > instance Functor m => Functor (StateLT m s) where > fmap f (StateLT k) = StateLT \$ \ s -> fmap f <\$> k s > instance (Functor m, Monad m) => Applicative (StateLT m s) where > pure x = StateLT (\ s -> return (s, x)) > StateLT kf <*> StateLT kv = StateLT kfv > where kfv s = do (s', f) <- kf s > (s'', v) <- kv s' > return (s'', f v) Incidently, I always wondered why Monad wasn't a subclass of Functor. > traverseAccumL :: ( Traversable t, Functor m, Monad m) > => (a -> b -> m (a, c)) -> a -> t b -> m (a, t c) > traverseAccumL f s t = runStateLT (traverse (StateLT . flip f) t) s I could have done without StateLT but the signature would have been different: traverseAccumL :: (Traversable t, Monad m) => (a -> b -> m (c, a)) -> a -> t b -> m (t c, a) traverseAccumL f s t = runStateT (mapM (StateT . flip f) t) s Now the definition of avg_diff calls traverseAccumL with the reader monad > avg_diff :: (Traversable t, Fractional f) > => t f -> t f > avg_diff t = > let start = (0,0.0) > step (n,s) x mean = ((n+1, s+x), x - mean) > ((n,s), diffs) = traverseAccumL step start t (s/n) > in diffs The dual definition traverseAccumR is almost the same. The only difference lies in the definition of <*> StateRT kf <*> StateRT kv = StateRT kfv where kfv s = do (s', v) <- kv s (s'', f) <- kf s' return (s'', f v) > -- right-to-left state transformer > newtype StateRT m s a = StateRT { runStateRT :: s -> m (s, a) } > > instance Functor f => Functor (StateRT f s) where > fmap f (StateRT k) = StateRT \$ \ s -> fmap f <\$> k s > > instance (Functor m, Monad m) => Applicative (StateRT m s) where > pure x = StateRT (\ s -> return (s, x)) > StateRT kf <*> StateRT kv = StateRT kfv > where kfv s = do (s', v) <- kv s > (s'', f) <- kf s' > return (s'', f v) > > traverseAccumR :: ( Traversable t, Functor m, Monad m) > => (a -> b -> m (a, c)) -> a -> t b -> m (a, t c) > traverseAccumR f s t = runStateRT (traverse (StateRT . flip f) t) s -- Florent B.```
CD: 4ms