Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo <at> elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel
Date: Tuesday 16th March 2010 15:52:21 UTC (over 7 years ago)
* Frank Ch. Eigler  wrote:

> 
> Ingo Molnar  writes:
> 
> > [...]
> >> >I.e. we really want to be able users to:
> >> >
> >> >  1) have it all working with a single guest, without having to
specify 'which'
> >> >     guest (qemu PID) to work with. That is the dominant usecase both
for
> >> >     developers and for a fair portion of testers.
> >> 
> >> That's reasonable if we can get it working simply.
> >
> > IMO such ease of use is reasonable and required, full stop.
> > If it cannot be gotten simply then that's a bug: either in the code, or
in the 
> > design, or in the development process that led to the design. Bugs need

> > fixing. [...]
> 
> Perhaps the fact that kvm happens to deal with an interesting application

> area (virtualization) is misleading here.  As far as the host kernel or 
> other host userspace is concerned, qemu is just some random unprivileged 
> userspace program (with some *optional* /dev/kvm services that might
happen 
> to require temporary root).
> 
> As such, perf trying to instrument qemu is no different than perf trying
to 
> instrument any other userspace widget.  Therefore, expecting 'trusted 
> enumeration' of instances is just as sensible as using 'trusted ps' and 
> 'trusted /var/run/FOO.pid files'.

You are quite mistaken: KVM isnt really a 'random unprivileged application'
in 
this context, it is clearly an extension of system/kernel services.

( Which can be seen from the simple fact that what started the discussion
was 
  'how do we get /proc/kallsyms from the guest'. I.e. an extension of the 
  existing host-space /proc/kallsyms was desired. )

In that sense the most natural 'extension' would be the solution i
mentioned a 
week or two ago: to have a (read only) mount of all guest filesystems, plus
a 
channel for profiling/tracing data. That would make symbol parsing easier
and 
it's what extends the existing 'host space' abstraction in the most natural

way.

( It doesnt even have to be done via the kernel - Qemu could implement that
  via FUSE for example. )

As a second best option a 'symbol server' might be used too.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
CD: 2ms