Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Rob Weir <robweir <at> apache.org>
Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice in Fedora 19?
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.openoffice.devel
Date: Wednesday 6th February 2013 22:19:36 UTC (over 4 years ago)
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:
> Am 02/06/2013 09:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>
>> On 31/01/2013 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> It got more coverage than needed, probably. It is just a proposal at
>>> this stage, like dozens of other proposals.
>>
>>
>> It is starting to become something a little bit more official now.
>> Minutes ago, the "FESCo meeting" (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee)
>> approved the feature for Fedora 19 unanimously, 9-0.
>
>
> Great news.
>
>
>> They will likely publish some minutes, but I copy-paste from the chat.
>> ---
>> Feature is accepted under the condition that the conflicts must be
>> worked out. OpenOffice and LibreOffice packagers get to work them out.
>> There is no FESCo mandate that LibreOffice must change to accommodate
>> OpenOffice at this time. Alternatives is not the way to resolve the
>> conflicts but environment-modules may be looked at as a similar means to
>> achieve that.
>> ---
>>
>> Explanations:
>>
>> - Conflicts are over the "soffice" and "unopkg" aliases, and possibly
>> others, which would be needed by both OpenOffice and LibreOffice. Here I
>> hope that the LibreOffice packagers can agree on some solutions (note:
>> it's really about the packages, since the upstream LibreOffice does not
>> conflict). Stephan Bergmann explained that there is still some usage of
>> the hard-coded "soffice" by external applications and in the SDK. So
>> this really needs to be clarified to see whether OpenOffice will break
>> if it doesn't own the "soffice" alias.
>>
>> - For historical reasons, the "ooffice", "oowriter"... aliases are
>> assigned to LibreOffice. Although we discussed it on the mailing lists,
>> this won't change. So, unless we have the funny idea of squatting
>> "lowriter", "localc"..., we are left with "aoowriter", "aoocalc" and so
>> on.
>
>
> I've the idea that both parties are changing to an own naming syntax:
>
> soffice -> aooffice *and* soffice -> loffice and so on with other names.
>
> Then both have work to do and nobody is in advantage to profit from old
> stuff.
>

But I would have trademark concerns if a statement like this installed
anything but OpenOffice:

sudo yum install openoffice.org

Regards,

-Rob

> But maybe this just an idealistic way and a naive point of view ;-).
>
> My 2 ct.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>
>> Fedora will branch for Alpha on 2 Apr 2013: we must have something
>> decently packaged by that time. At FOSDEM I met the Fedora people
>> together with Herbert and Andre, so we already have some knowledge of
>> the process.
>>
>> More details:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrea.
 
CD: 3ms