Subject: Re: Clarifying facts
Date: Wednesday 14th March 2012 02:53:00 UTC (over 5 years ago)
On 14 Mar 2012, at 02:36, Rob Weir wrote: > > Let's see if anyone else thinks this is too verbose. Remember, FAQ's > are not intended to be read as an article, one after another. > Typically they are things we we link to and point users to for > specific questions. Since you have essentially eliminated my contributions and replaced them with something different, I'll withdraw from this activity until the partisan style you've chosen changes. A pity as we genuinely had some collaboration sparking between unlike minds. As an added bonus you'll not have to worry about any edit locks :-) S.